Skip to content

18+ · Gambling can be addictive. Please play responsibly.

Regulation · Tax

Online Gambling Taxation Compared: Rates and Tax Bases in 2026

A comparison of online gambling tax rates and bases in 2026, from the UK's 40% remote gaming duty to Germany's turnover tax and Brazil's rising GGR levy.

By the We2Bet Editorial Team Updated 4 min read

Gambling tax is one of the most politically charged parts of regulation. Governments see a profitable industry with significant social costs. Operators argue that every point of tax pushes prices up for players or squeezes the licensed market against untaxed offshore rivals. This comparison sets out the position as of October 2026. Rates change often, so check each country’s regulatory profile for updates.

Tax bases: GGR versus turnover

Before comparing rates, it matters what is being taxed.

  • Gross gaming revenue (GGR): stakes minus winnings paid. This is the most common base. A 20% GGR tax takes one fifth of the operator’s margin.
  • Turnover (stakes): tax on every euro wagered, regardless of outcome. Even a low percentage can be very heavy. On a slot paying back 96%, the operator’s margin is 4% of stakes, so a 5.3% stake tax exceeds the whole margin unless RTP is cut.
  • Net gaming revenue (NGR): GGR minus bonuses and sometimes other deductions. It is used in some markets and in private revenue-share arrangements.

Headline rates for online gambling (October 2026)

JurisdictionOnline casino / gamingOnline bettingBase
United Kingdom40% remote gaming duty (from 1 April 2026, up from 21%)15% general betting duty; remote rate due to rise to 25% from April 2027 (horse racing stays at 15%)GGR
Netherlands37.8% (from 1 January 2026)37.8%GGR
Denmark28%28%GGR
Sweden22% (from 1 July 2024, up from 18%)22%GGR
Italy25.5%, plus a 3% annual concession fee on NGR24.5%GGR
Spain20%20%GGR
Germany5.3% on virtual slots and online poker5.3%Stakes
Malta15% for Type 1 games, 10% for Types 2–4 (from 1 October 2026, up from 5%)10%GGR from Malta-based players only
Brazil13% in 2026, rising to 14% in 2027 and 15% in 2028SameGGR
Canada (Ontario)20% revenue share with iGaming Ontario20%GGR

US states set their own rates, and the range is very wide. Pennsylvania, for example, levies 54% on online slot revenue and 36% on sports betting, while other states charge well under 20%. Australia’s states apply point-of-consumption taxes on wagering revenue. France uses a complex mix of taxes and social levies on sports, racing and poker, and does not license online casino at all.

The 2025–2026 wave of increases

Tax rates have risen across several major markets in a short space of time.

  • United Kingdom: the November 2025 Budget nearly doubled remote gaming duty to 40% from April 2026. It also created a higher 25% remote betting rate from April 2027, while abolishing bingo duty and leaving in-person betting at 15%. The stated aim was to tax remote gambling, seen as higher-harm, more heavily.
  • Netherlands: the gambling tax rose from 30.5% in 2024 to 34.2% in 2025 and 37.8% in 2026. Reports in mid-2026 suggested the increases raised less revenue than forecast, which fed a debate about channelisation.
  • Brazil: Complementary Law 224, signed at the end of 2025, phases the GGR tax up from 12% to 15% by 2028.
  • Malta: a revised framework from 1 October 2026 raised the rate on locally sourced gaming revenue. Because most Malta-licensed revenue comes from abroad, the practical effect is narrower than the headline suggests.

Tax, channelisation and the black market

Regulators and tax authorities do not always pull in the same direction. High taxes can mean:

  • Lower return-to-player rates or less generous odds for licensed customers
  • Less spending on compliance and safer-gambling tools
  • Market exits by smaller licensed operators
  • A price advantage for unlicensed operators that pay no tax and apply no protections

Germany is the most-cited example. Its 5.3% stake tax, combined with strict product rules, has been blamed by industry groups for low channelisation in online slots, although estimates vary and are disputed. Supporters of high taxes counter that gambling harms impose real costs on health and social services, and that revenue should help pay for them. For a sense of how operator margins work, see how house edge works.

Levies earmarked for harm prevention

Alongside general taxes, some countries impose dedicated levies:

  • United Kingdom: a statutory gambling levy took effect in April 2025, replacing voluntary contributions, to fund research, prevention and treatment.
  • Italy: concessionaires must fund responsible-gambling measures at 0.2% of GGR, capped at €1 million a year.
  • Australia and others: levies fund self-exclusion systems and support services.

Point of consumption

Most modern regimes tax on a “point of consumption” basis, meaning by where the player is located rather than where the operator is based. This is why offshore licensing hubs collect only modest tax from their licensees.

What players should take from this

Players rarely see gambling taxes directly, but they shape the product. Higher operator taxes often mean worse odds or lower RTPs. Our house edge calculator shows how even small changes in margin add up over time. None of this changes the basic arithmetic that gambling is priced to favour the operator. For business readers, our comparison of licensing costs covers fees alongside taxes. Tax law is complex and changes frequently, so professional advice is essential for any commercial decision.

Frequently asked questions

Do players pay tax on gambling winnings?

This article covers taxes on operators. Whether players pay tax on winnings depends on the country: winnings are generally tax-free in the UK, but taxable in the United States and in some other countries above certain thresholds. Check your national tax authority's guidance.

What is gross gaming revenue (GGR)?

GGR is the total amount staked minus the amount paid out as winnings. It is the operator's revenue before costs, and the most common basis for gambling taxes.

Why does Germany's turnover tax matter?

A 5.3% tax on every stake forces operators to cut return-to-player rates, because the tax can exceed the operator's margin on high-RTP games. Critics argue this pushes players to unlicensed sites.

Important: This article is general information, not legal, financial or medical advice. Rules change — always confirm with the relevant regulator. If gambling is causing you harm, free support is available.